Vargas Llosa appealed to faith
Mario Vargas Llosa has said he will vote for Ollanta Humala in the runoff election. It has also warned he would ask his countrymen to follow suit.
reactions I've seen all kinds in connection with their statements. I regret and reject those which range from disqualification to personal insult. For those who are not Fujimori and Humala decide this vote is an algebraic problem.
By coincidence I was present at the closing dinner of the regional assembly of the Mont Pelerin Society in Buenos Aires, where he developed his position MVLl. The context helps to explain their reasoning.
VLL said that, despite everything, Latin America was moving. There are fewer dictators, he noted, to the extent they have become an endangered species.
In Peru, therefore, had to choose one sentence to the option that represents a dictatorship of the past. Could not vote for Keiko Fujimori, because that was back.
VLL's reasoning, however, does not hold. If you look at the plan of government of Ghana Peru concludes that it will intervene comprehensively the economy. That does not lead to something else, sooner or later, that the liquidation of the rule of law.
course, is the hope, the "miracle" in the words of VLL. Ollanta Humala could change and turn into a government of consensus, to Lula.
The "consensus" of Lula, however, conceal a system based on corruption. In the particular businesses across the state favors. Mercantilism is a populist, which continues in power.
On the other hand, if it comes to miracles, one might expect the "miracle" that Keiko Fujimori govern according to democratic rules and not according to current dictatorship of his father. VLL
relies more on the miracle relation to one candidate. Support your position in this act of faith.
If freedoms are threatened, says VLL would protest. Is not it this collection for both?
Neither candidate has been cleared so far, in my opinion, there are doubts about them. VLL is more afraid of a dictatorship of the past that a possible future.
To decide an election that hard, look at the ideas and programs. Also in the companies and, especially, in which many millions of suns financing of campaigns.
can opt for Humala, but VLL reasons for this are not good. I will not close my eyes when voting.
Source: La República (Peru)
reactions I've seen all kinds in connection with their statements. I regret and reject those which range from disqualification to personal insult. For those who are not Fujimori and Humala decide this vote is an algebraic problem.
By coincidence I was present at the closing dinner of the regional assembly of the Mont Pelerin Society in Buenos Aires, where he developed his position MVLl. The context helps to explain their reasoning.
VLL said that, despite everything, Latin America was moving. There are fewer dictators, he noted, to the extent they have become an endangered species.
In Peru, therefore, had to choose one sentence to the option that represents a dictatorship of the past. Could not vote for Keiko Fujimori, because that was back.
VLL's reasoning, however, does not hold. If you look at the plan of government of Ghana Peru concludes that it will intervene comprehensively the economy. That does not lead to something else, sooner or later, that the liquidation of the rule of law.
course, is the hope, the "miracle" in the words of VLL. Ollanta Humala could change and turn into a government of consensus, to Lula.
The "consensus" of Lula, however, conceal a system based on corruption. In the particular businesses across the state favors. Mercantilism is a populist, which continues in power.
On the other hand, if it comes to miracles, one might expect the "miracle" that Keiko Fujimori govern according to democratic rules and not according to current dictatorship of his father. VLL
relies more on the miracle relation to one candidate. Support your position in this act of faith.
If freedoms are threatened, says VLL would protest. Is not it this collection for both?
Neither candidate has been cleared so far, in my opinion, there are doubts about them. VLL is more afraid of a dictatorship of the past that a possible future.
To decide an election that hard, look at the ideas and programs. Also in the companies and, especially, in which many millions of suns financing of campaigns.
can opt for Humala, but VLL reasons for this are not good. I will not close my eyes when voting.
Source: La República (Peru)
0 comments:
Post a Comment