by Ricardo Lago V
According to Congressman Victor Andres Garcia Belaunde this Act it does is provide legal cover for what is basically a theft of corporate resources by managers in emerging cheated workers and taxpayers.
"corruption, and this is a corrupt law, which is why we oppose it," Victor Andres Garcia Balaunde
the case where the full bench Humala has promoted and voted for this law. It is obvious that one can not creetr Gacia both Belaunde Congressman and Congresswoman Marisol Espinoza, 180 diverge as their afformations grados.Por therefore must believe in the arguments of one of the two.
I think the arguments of Victor Andres Garcia Belaunde.
And you? ----------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------- -
ARGUMENTS PRESENTED AT THE MEETING OF NOVEMBER 25, 2010
Mrs. ESPINOZA CRUZ (GPN) .- President: In the Land Commission, nosotroshemos heard from workers. They have reported tax payment of 18 million new soles for October and 23 million new soles for when the end of the year. The concern we have is with the hiring of a member of the opposition group trying to buy into the program
ProInversión. In other words, "had put the cat butler." It is therefore proposed that the companies guarantee the payment schedules and adjustments Workers are. It also requires compliance with the obligations of the sugar companies to its creditors. Do not forget that the first creditor, by law, the worker. That is the concern we've had in the Land Commission to support the proposal in debate.Esta proposal was approved unanimously by the Land Commission, for which I proceed to the vote, Mr. Chairman. Thanks.
Mr. Garcia Belaunde (AP) .- Mr. President, I fully agree with Mr. Bedoya. It is a shame that today, discussing the budget for the Republic, receiving Mr. Piñera, president of a neighboring republic, with absolutacordialidad has shown you, suddenly put into a project delque debate and I'd heard he was going to review here, although I could not believe that happen.
Congresswoman Marisol Espinoza, who appreciate and admire, refers to a meeting endonde has received some group workers Oviedo, some, not all. I herecibido everyone. And she has said that taxes were paid. Not true. Losimpuestos contained in the notices are deductions that have been made of the Sales ImpuestoGeneral, deductions, Mr. President, they have not paid impuestos.Y the company is worse today than before, have more debt than before and liabilities as before , is a company that is manipulating the population. Sacadounos notices have against me, simply oppose oppose, as anyone sepuede opposed-to a law here is the warning. Who pays for these ads estaFederación of Sugar Workers of Peru, which is a spurious association porqueno is registered with the Ministry of Labour? Workers who sign are pseudo union and all employees of the group are Oviedo.Esta is a law for the group because it only benefits Oviedo Pomalca Tumán.Y and manages the group Oviedo Tumán Pomalca and habeas corpus and juecescorruptos. Approved directories and balances to habeas corpus does deChiclayo judges? Chiclayo not to judges, but judges Bongará, Amazonas, deTrujillo. That is, Oviedo is a mafia group. But it is a cowardly mob because Noponen insult his name when a parliamentarian; they are cowards.
At least Al Capone and Pablo Escobar was pants was a brave man. Encambio, these mafia group Oviedo are cowards who do not put their name ymandan to proxies and lackeys to insult parliamentarians and link them with business that does not exist. I have nothing to do with the agricultural world or the group Gloria.No know them, do not know who they are. A group of Oviedo do not know them, but the group has a management Oviedo mafioso.Con this type of advertising they want to insult the parliamentarians. And who has rallied in Parliament with these ads is called "liar" to an MP? Mr President, here's the warning and get into notice two people who have nothing to do with it, referred to Mr. Kleinberg, whom I know very little. What DondeEsta, then Parliament?, Why Parliament did not allow me to rotate 200 milnuevos soles to answer these lies?, Where do we draw the parliamentarians 200 000 new soles?
Mr. Garcia Belaunde (AP) .- When a company has problems, susactivos sell and sell their assets to get ahead. Ford, Chrysler and GeneralMotors have. Why not sell assets sugar companies? Eight nursing añosestán free, eight are milking the cow without pay, but selling milk. That is a privilege that can not be accepted in Peru. We have heard aMichael Porter at CADE 2010, where he talks about competitiveness, but also speaks of corruption, and this is a corrupt law, which is why we oppose it.
Read more: http://blogs.semanaeconomica.com/blogs/el-nuevo-sol/posts/adjunto-material-para-seguir-manana-el-debate-sobre-faenon-del-azucar- on-the-conference # comments # ixzz1K7ZVjLYz
------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------- ------
http://www2.congreso.gob.pe/Sicr/Prensa/heraldo.nsf/CNtitulares1/6aeb2ad96823f0e1052578780078de66/?OpenDocument
overwhelmingly
CONGRESS APPROVES LAW TO INSIST IN BUSINESS make viable SUGAR REGIME
overwhelmingly passed the House of Congress on Wednesday, 20 insistence on the text of the opinion of the bill feasible measures available to the system of sugar farm businesses for the purpose of implementing Law 29299, Law of Expansion of Wealth Protection and Transfer of Equity Interest of the State to undertakings.
The Agricultural Commission's opinion states that do not accept any comments of the Executive and therefore agree to insist on the original text which states that the period of the transfer of state involvement in agricultural enterprises sugar unfailingly ends December 31, 2011, and the system of protection of these assets.
The provision gives also suspended the sale of shares of farms sugar while they are in effect the deadlines established by this law.
Earlier, the chairman of the Committee on Economy, Rafael Yamashiro (A), sustained a new opinion of its working group, which also was supported by the holder of the Land Commission, Aníbal Huerta (PAP).
After brief remarks of congressmen Isaac Mekler (AN), Luis Falla Lamadrid (PAP), Daniel Abugattás (GPN) and Karina Beteta (UPP), who supported the proposal and called for an immediate vote on the insistence. Beteta Congresswoman asked to vote to put the emphasis on the autograph of the bill reported by the executive branch, whose report was approved by the Committee Agraria.
response, the director of the debate, Congressman Alejandro Aguinaga (GPF), first vice president of Congress, the question put to a vote after it received 74 votes in favor, two against and two abstentions. Then approved the insistence by 71 votes in favor, four against and three abstentions, which was ready for promulgation by the President of Congress.
----------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------
http://elcomercio.pe/ economia/745811/noticia-aprobaron-ley-proteccion-patrimonial-azucareras
Of The Trade
The standard was approved by valid for one year and will be enacted in the coming days. Sugar workers promised to leave the Plaza Dos de Mayo
Protection Act Equity for sugar was approved today by the full House with 71 votes in favor and five against. This rule will be valid for one year and will be enacted in the coming days.
"If this was not the law the sugar workers would go from first to last place creditors and debtors," said Congressman Jorge del Castillo in dialogue with Radio Programs. It is recalled that the controversial law was observed by President Alan Garcia, who said it was "discriminatory" and "benefit" power groups.
The workers' leader, Demetrio Ruiz, said that tonight is meet with the federation that meets tomorrow to leave the Plaza Dos de Mayo, the camping site for 100 days.
For its part, the MP Yonhy Lescano hoped that the adoption of the law guarantees the protection of the rights of workers.
Read more: http://blogs.semanaeconomica.com/blogs/el-nuevo-sol/posts/se-aprobo-la-ley-oviedo-que-les-parece # ixzz1KBxSjiVz
SOURCE: El Nuevo Sol (Ricardo Lago V)
0 comments:
Post a Comment