Lima - If Ollanta got a Nobel why I can not get to a future Nobel Prize for Economics ? That seems to be the question that motivated Keiko Fujimori to call the renowned director of ILD and to embark on a new adventure for reforming the state and strengthen the path towards a true market economy.
Keiko Your approach is a counterpoint to the accolade of Mario Vargas Llosa Humala?
(laughs) No. Keiko calls me to pick up some of our programs, they are considered a supplement to its plan to combat poverty.
is not the first time it is summoned by a president or presidential candidate, the truth is that all these experiences have ended badly.
rather than say were incomplete. In Garcia's first government, with laws to simplify created the first administrative tools that help further economic adjustment. Back in 1989, with the fall of the Berlin Wall, Garcia understood that the left did not come out the program. With (Alberto) Fujimori spent 178 standards. We design the international reform agenda, including the adjustment program was successful or shock.
Does paternity of that success is going to play Carlos Bologna?
Fujimori was elected on 10 June 1990 and the eleven calls me to be prime minister. I say he was willing to help to make economic reform. He is then advised by the "Seven Samurai" (Figueroa, rock, etc..) And also the plan prepared by them make a counteroffer.
Como (Fujimori) did not know what to choose I would propose a meeting with the World Bank, IDB, etc. to tell them what plan would support. We traveled on June 28, 1990 and our proposal was described by Camdessus, the IMF executive director, as heavenly music. On July 1, 1990 (framed clipping shows) the New York Times announced the approval of the rehabilitation program and only then called Carlos Bologna.
Thereafter came many multilateral technical, but those who took the hot potato were the ILD. Nobody fired with a carpet of flowers, but that's the story of which we get to put the shoulder.
What makes you think that Keiko will do better?
Political reforms are always given in steps. Consider the history of the European Union. It took time, achieved success and now may be dismembers for the debts of Greece, Portugal and Spain. Nothing is perfect. I do not go into this with the hope of hearing drums of glory. Just try to give a good contribution. And surely after critics will point out all flaws, but we will proceed likewise. In Keiko's known since I was fifteen years, the truth, I was impressed by his maturity, to see things clearly and that is good policy. Obviously we love to share our vision to fight poverty.
And do not fear that I finished dispatching the Diroes?
really do not think so. I have no way of knowing how to influence their behavior Chlimper Pepe, Rafael Rey, her father or mother. I know it's a person who thinks independently. None of the conversations we had seen her pick up the phone to call the Diroes.
What is the specific input and ILD HdS to force government plan 2011?
I think she has the beams. We have a project on how to do certain things in depth and we are dedicated to it over 25 years. We provide the possibility of incorporating the poor into the market economy to be prosperous and at the same time resolve the major conflicts that threaten to Peru and are behind this massive vote antistablishment. Call it
Bagua, Islay or Tambogrande are all problems of territorial order. This is not surprising, as happens everywhere in the world. We live in times of excess capital and raw material shortages. There is an avalanche of money into Africa, Asia and Latin America buying natural resources, generates enormous conflict between the haves and the have-nots.
These conflicts can be avoided if people living near the big cities also have his own: but the majority, although land possession, has no legal title or access to a limited liability company scheme. Without access to a modern legal structure that people feel displaced or alienated. That is 55% of Peruvians who voted to change a status quo that does not believe that favorable.
We not only give legal cover to formalize and multiply the capital, but also solve much of the country's political problems. When the excluded feel included, the political will move to positions less radical and more compatible with success.
How does this support the ILD concrete?
So far we have been called and have asked us a project summary will be published tomorrow (today) in media and Keiko will be announced by Monday. We are not seeking a government job. The ILD designed programs for many countries, some we will implement and not in others. Obviously we think it is better first, but this will be later.
"support to Fujimori to win the second round is not also validate the trampling of democracy and DD. HH. of his father?
My deal is with Keiko and I see her as an authoritative person. I see a leader who is not willing to repeat the mistakes of the father. Besides she knows that since 1992 we did nothing but criticize his dad for his tendency to associate with gangsters. As I do not believe that authoritarianism is inherited, I'm looking forward. As Revel said, if Europe has been looking back after 50 million dead of World War II would have no future. That argument seems to me very poor recognition.
Source: E
Keiko Your approach is a counterpoint to the accolade of Mario Vargas Llosa Humala?
(laughs) No. Keiko calls me to pick up some of our programs, they are considered a supplement to its plan to combat poverty.
is not the first time it is summoned by a president or presidential candidate, the truth is that all these experiences have ended badly.
rather than say were incomplete. In Garcia's first government, with laws to simplify created the first administrative tools that help further economic adjustment. Back in 1989, with the fall of the Berlin Wall, Garcia understood that the left did not come out the program. With (Alberto) Fujimori spent 178 standards. We design the international reform agenda, including the adjustment program was successful or shock.
Does paternity of that success is going to play Carlos Bologna?
Fujimori was elected on 10 June 1990 and the eleven calls me to be prime minister. I say he was willing to help to make economic reform. He is then advised by the "Seven Samurai" (Figueroa, rock, etc..) And also the plan prepared by them make a counteroffer.
Como (Fujimori) did not know what to choose I would propose a meeting with the World Bank, IDB, etc. to tell them what plan would support. We traveled on June 28, 1990 and our proposal was described by Camdessus, the IMF executive director, as heavenly music. On July 1, 1990 (framed clipping shows) the New York Times announced the approval of the rehabilitation program and only then called Carlos Bologna.
Thereafter came many multilateral technical, but those who took the hot potato were the ILD. Nobody fired with a carpet of flowers, but that's the story of which we get to put the shoulder.
What makes you think that Keiko will do better?
Political reforms are always given in steps. Consider the history of the European Union. It took time, achieved success and now may be dismembers for the debts of Greece, Portugal and Spain. Nothing is perfect. I do not go into this with the hope of hearing drums of glory. Just try to give a good contribution. And surely after critics will point out all flaws, but we will proceed likewise. In Keiko's known since I was fifteen years, the truth, I was impressed by his maturity, to see things clearly and that is good policy. Obviously we love to share our vision to fight poverty.
And do not fear that I finished dispatching the Diroes?
really do not think so. I have no way of knowing how to influence their behavior Chlimper Pepe, Rafael Rey, her father or mother. I know it's a person who thinks independently. None of the conversations we had seen her pick up the phone to call the Diroes.
What is the specific input and ILD HdS to force government plan 2011?
I think she has the beams. We have a project on how to do certain things in depth and we are dedicated to it over 25 years. We provide the possibility of incorporating the poor into the market economy to be prosperous and at the same time resolve the major conflicts that threaten to Peru and are behind this massive vote antistablishment. Call it
Bagua, Islay or Tambogrande are all problems of territorial order. This is not surprising, as happens everywhere in the world. We live in times of excess capital and raw material shortages. There is an avalanche of money into Africa, Asia and Latin America buying natural resources, generates enormous conflict between the haves and the have-nots.
These conflicts can be avoided if people living near the big cities also have his own: but the majority, although land possession, has no legal title or access to a limited liability company scheme. Without access to a modern legal structure that people feel displaced or alienated. That is 55% of Peruvians who voted to change a status quo that does not believe that favorable.
We not only give legal cover to formalize and multiply the capital, but also solve much of the country's political problems. When the excluded feel included, the political will move to positions less radical and more compatible with success.
How does this support the ILD concrete?
So far we have been called and have asked us a project summary will be published tomorrow (today) in media and Keiko will be announced by Monday. We are not seeking a government job. The ILD designed programs for many countries, some we will implement and not in others. Obviously we think it is better first, but this will be later.
"support to Fujimori to win the second round is not also validate the trampling of democracy and DD. HH. of his father?
My deal is with Keiko and I see her as an authoritative person. I see a leader who is not willing to repeat the mistakes of the father. Besides she knows that since 1992 we did nothing but criticize his dad for his tendency to associate with gangsters. As I do not believe that authoritarianism is inherited, I'm looking forward. As Revel said, if Europe has been looking back after 50 million dead of World War II would have no future. That argument seems to me very poor recognition.
Source: E
0 comments:
Post a Comment