Abimael Falls in Lima and in Abbottabad
Osama
Osama
Similarities and differences between the operations against the leaders of Peru hiking and Al Qaeda. Today when the world looks at the death of Osama Bin Laden, considered the world's number one terrorist ", it is useful to compare this with the process leading to personal and ideological surrender of Abimael Guzman, who two decades ago was branded as "terrorist number one in the Americas." Abimael
was arrested on 12 September 1992 at a residence in the Surco district of Lima, not far from the "little Pentagon" Peruvian military, while the mastermind of the massacre of 11 September 2001, he living located in Abbottabad, near the Pakistan Military Academy.
both fell being advanced fifties who led networks of thousands of ideologically motivated fanatics willing to die. While operating walkers throughout Peru but with ambitions to be the beacon that Maoism would rebuild the world after the "betrayal of Beijing," Al Qaeda is a global conglomerate of Islamic fundamentalists who condemn the capitulation of the Moslem states to the West. Both movements, ideological, national and socially dissimilar, but highly militarized, performed the worst attacks have been given the power centers of their enemies.
hunting Guzman was prepared and made by the intelligence services of their own country, while bin Laden was given by foreign troops who would not notify Pakistan, wary of its intelligence.
Today the two candidates vying for the Peruvian presidency in June claiming the capture of Abimael. General Ketin Vidal, who led the operation in 1992, is a team of Ollanta Humala, while Keiko Fujimori's father was then president. In contrast, no Pakistani politician can claim to have participated in the operation of Abbottabad. Rather, this action has humiliated the Pakistani regime and serve to question. In contrast, the operation against Abimael's what Fujimori catapulted to govern two periods and can Abbottabad Obama is reelected. The Peruvian government wanted to capture Guzman to show the world and demoralize him with jail and a public trial. The United States, by contrast, were to liquidate bin Laden (whose body has not even been shown in photos).
When Guzman was arrested walking was at its zenith and in prison he was "softened up" to get him to call his comrades to lay down arms, to seek "national reconciliation" and presented for the first time in elections to the demand amnesty for all (including those who were tortured and killed) in which they took their discredited out about 6,000 votes nationwide (less than 0.1%).
The U.S., however, struck down Bin Laden thought it was more dangerous than he is to stand trial which could reveal the ties he had with the CIA and its allies, and that in 2011 Al Qaeda is in decline, as the Muslim masses in large pro-democracy marches have left out.
If Guzman was the all-powerful president and "basis of party unity," Bin Laden has proved to be only a leading figure in a worldwide federation of autonomous groups.
0 comments:
Post a Comment